This section provides some historically specific discussions of power in the United States at the national and local levels. You may also be interested in the Studying Power section of this site, which covers methodological issues.
Power is based in ideological, economic, military and political networks -- Michael Mann's "IEMP model." It's my preferred approach, leading to a class-domination theory when applied to the United States.
The main rivals to the Four Network theory: pluralism, state autonomy theory, elite theory, and Marxism.
I contrast the untenable psychological assumptions of conspiracy theories, which lead them to be wrong on the key issues, with the more solidly grounded sociological assumptions that are used by social scientists who study power.
Some historical background on power structure research; a detailed critique of pluralism; and a critique of structural Marxists.
This is my take on how Mills's classic book, The Power Elite, looked 50 years after its publication in 2006. It reads better than ever with respect to the higher levels of the social ladder, but not very well concerning the rest of the society and how events would unfold. Mills' theory was too narrow to allow for the possibility of the Civil Rights Movement and the other social movements of the 1960s.
This document differs from the more sociologically-oriented article about C. Wright Mills & Floyd Hunter by focusing on the several weaknesses in studies of power by political scientists.
All content ©2023 G. William Domhoff, unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.